Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Airway Diseases: Pathological Roles and Therapeutic Implications.

Neutrophils are important effector cells of the innate immune response that fight pathogens by phagocytosis and degranulation. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are released into the extracellular space to defend against invading pathogens. Although NETs play a defensive role against pathogens, excessive NETs can contribute to the pathogenesis of airway diseases. NETs are known to be directly cytotoxic to the lung epithelium and endothelium, highly involved in acute lung injury, and implicated in disease severity and exacerbation. This review describes the role of NET formation in airway diseases, including chronic rhinosinusitis, and suggests that targeting NETs could be a therapeutic strategy for airway diseases.

Dupilumab as a steroid-sparing treatment option in pediatric severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Case report Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a frequent comorbidity in severe asthma in adults. Both diseases share key pathophysiological mechanisms that can involve type-2 inflammatory pathways. However, this is an uncommon presentation in pediatric patients. Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against IL-4Ralpha, inhibits IL-4/ IL-13 signaling, which are key drivers of type-2 inflammation and interfere with both eosinophilic and allergic pathways. It is approved for patients >= 12-year- old with moderate to severe uncontrolled asthma, but its approval in CRSwNP is limited to adults. We report a case of a 12-year- old boy with severe uncontrolled asthma and highly symptomatic CRSwNP referred to our center in May 2021. He was sensitized to house dust mite and pollens, and a specific immunotherapy had been tried previously. He was treated with high dose inhaled corticosteroid, long-acting beta agonist, long-acting muscarinic antagonist, montelukast and daily intra-nasal corticosteroids. Furthermore, a bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery with polypectomy was performed in April 2021. Despite adherence to medication and surgical treatment, both diseases were uncontrolled with frequent exacerbations requiring unscheduled visits and multiple systemic corticosteroid courses. This led to failure to thrive and several missed school days. Oral corticosteroid (OCS) tapering was unachieved due to symptoms rebound and so maintenance therapy with prednisolone 10mg daily was attempted, with only a slight improvement. High levels of eosinophils (1010 cells/muL), FeNO (122 ppb) and IgE (2255 kU/L) were present. Treatment with subcutaneous dupilumab was started in July 2021. A clinical and analytical improvement was evident at the 3-month evaluation (Table 1). He was able to stop prednisolone, and no clinically relevant exacerbations occurred. He also was fully vaccinated and had an asymptomatic COVID-19 infection in December 2021. Patients with CRSwNP and comorbid asthma have a higher disease burden than patients with each disease alone. In this adolescent, dupilumab was effective as an add-on treatment, for both severe asthma and CRSwNP. It led to disease control, OCS withdrawal, reduced eosinophilic inflammation, improved lung function, smell recovery and absence of exacerbations during follow-up. Dupilumab, targeting the type 2 inflammatory process, may allow a better management of pediatric patients >=12 years old with severe CRSwNP and comorbid asthma. (Table Presented).

The use of biologics during the COVID 19 pandemic: Data of an allergy unit of a tertiary hospital in Greece

Background: The use of biologics during the pandemic has raised concerns throughout the scientific community. The current guidelines suggest continuing the use of biologics during the pandemic, while the initiation or continuation of treatment in case of symptomatic disease are remaining controversial unanswered questions. As a result the purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of symptomatic COVID19 infection in patients treated with biologic agents in an Allergy Unit of a University Hospital during the pandemic. Method(s): Patients of the Allergy Unit "D Kalogeromitros", who due to asthma, atopic dermatitis, Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria(CSU) or Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP)were under treatment with biologic agents were included in the present study. Treatment of at least 2 months until the 31/12/2021 was necessary for a patient to be included in the present study. Result(s): A total of 77 patients [46 (59.7%) women, mean age 48.2 (range 15-82) years were included. The mean duration of treatment with biologics was 34.9 months (SD: +/-37 months). Overall, 83.1% (64/77) of patients were receiving omalizumab for asthma and CSU [13/64 (20.3%) and 51/64 (79.6%) respectively] while 9.1% (7/77) were receiving dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (4/7) and CRSwNP [4/7 (57.1%) and 3/7 (42.8%) respectively]. In addition, 5/77 (6.5%) and 1/77 (1.2%) were under treatment with mepolizumab and one with benralizumab respectively, due to severe uncontrolled asthma. A total of 6 patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria and 2/19 patients with asthma (1/5 with mepolizumab and 1/13 with omalizumab) had symptomatic COVID 19 infection as confirmed with a positive Polymerase Chain Reaction or Rapid Test. None of the patients treated with benralizumab or dupilumab had symptomatic COVID19 infection. Overall, 8/77 (10.3%) of patients had symptomatic SARS-CoV2 infection during the above period, a rate similar to the onein the same period identified in the general Greek population (11.2%). All patients had mild symptoms during the disease course with no patient admission to hospital. Conclusion(s): The frequency of symptomatic COVID19 infection identified in a population of Greek patients treated with biologic agents was no higher than than the one in the general Greek population. Furthermore, all patients had a mild course of the disease with no admissions, indicating that the use of biologics is a safe choice and can be continued during the pandemic.

A Decade of Clinical Advances in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: 2012-2022.

The field of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is constantly evolving. In the past 10 years, key advancements in basic and translational research as well as clinical studies have improved our understanding and management of CRS. Notably, treatment options have expanded to include novel therapeutic drugs, devices, and surgical techniques. Assessments of patient symptoms and their impact on quality of life have become more standardized. Progress has also been made in both determining the true prevalence of CRS and recognizing comorbidities that can impact CRS severity. Practice guidelines have also shifted from expert opinion to more data-driven analyses. This review highlights major clinical advancements made in the field of CRS over the past 10 years as well as identifies current gaps in knowledge that can form the basis for new areas of study over the next decade.

The impact of chronic rhinosinusitis on COVID-19 risk and outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The impact of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and subsequent steroid therapy on acquiring COVID-19 and severe outcomes remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to provide cumulative evidence regarding the risk of COVID-19 and the impact of steroid therapy, length of hospital stay, mechanical ventilation, and mortality among CRC patients. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive electronic search strategy using the relevant keywords. The outcomes and risk factors of COVID-19 in CRS patients was estimated and compared to a healthy control group when applicable. Results: A total of seven studies were included, with an estimated prevalence of 6.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5-15.7) for COVID-19 in the CRS group. COVID-19 prevalence did not differ between CRS and controls (odds ratio (OR): 0.92; 95%CI: 0.84-1.01; p = 0.08). Moreover, using steroid/immunosuppressive therapy did not significantly increase the risk of acquiring COVID-19 in CRS patients compared to the control group (OR: 3.31; 95%CI: 0.72-15.26; p = 0.12). Length of hospital stay, mechanical ventilation, and mortality rates were comparable between the two groups. Furthermore, we found that male sex, cardiovascular morbidity, renal diseases, and hypertension were inversely associated with COVID-19 infection (p < 0.01). Conclusion: CRS had a neutral effect on acquiring COVID-19 and developing severe outcomes. However, further studies are needed.

Human T2R38 Bitter Taste Receptor Expression and COVID-19: From Immunity to Prognosis

Background: Bitter taste-sensing type 2 receptor (T2Rs or TAS2Rs) found on ciliated epithelial cells and solitary chemosensory cells have a role in respiratory tract immuni-ty. T2Rs have shown protection against SARS-CoV-2 by enhancing the innate immune response. The purpose of this review is to outline the current sphere of knowledge re-garding this association. Method(s): A narrative review of the literature was done by searching (T2R38 OR bitter taste receptor) AND (COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2) keywords in PubMed and google scholar. Result(s): T2R38, an isoform of T2Rs encoded by the TAS2R38 gene, may have a potential association between phenotypic expression of T2R38 and prognosis of COVID-19. Current studies suggest that due to different genotypes and widespread distributions of T2Rs within the respiratory tract and their role in innate immunity, treatment protocols for COVID-19 and other respiratory diseases may change accordingly. Based on the phenotypic expression of T2R38, it varies in innate immunity and host response to respiratory infection, systemic symptoms and hospitalization. Conclusion(s): This review reveals that patients' innate immune response to SARS-COV-2 could be influenced by T2R38 receptor allelic variations.Copyright © 2023, Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology.

Improvement of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 during dupilumab therapy: A case report.

Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) is an intractable type 2 inflammatory disease of the paranasal sinuses that persists even after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and systemic corticosteroid therapy. Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody against the shared receptor components of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, is a novel and effective treatment option for ECRS. Herein, an atypical case of ECRS that improved after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during dupilumab therapy is reported. A 40-year-old man with a history of ESS for ECRS visited our hospital with complaints of nasal congestion and dysosmia. Nasal endoscopy revealed bilateral nasal polyps occupying the nasal cavity. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a soft tissue density lesion filling all sinuses on both sides. Based on these findings, ECRS recurrence was confirmed; however, 3 years of subsequent corticosteroid therapy did not improve disease activity. Accordingly, dupilumab therapy was initiated, although 6 months of therapy resulted in only slight improvement in ECRS. Eight months after the initiation of dupilumab therapy, the patient was infected with SARS-CoV-2; thereafter, he noticed an improvement in smell. Nasal endoscopy and sinus CT revealed a marked reduction in nasal polyps and soft tissue density lesions of the sinuses, respectively. With continued dupilumab therapy, no re-exacerbation of ECRS was confirmed at the 6-month follow-up from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Currently, there are no reports describing the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on ECRS. As such, careful follow-up and accumulation of cases are necessary.

Randomized, Controlled Trial of Exhalation Delivery System with Fluticasone for Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Nasal Polyps

Introduction: There are no FDA-approved medications for the >20 million chronic rhinosinusitis patients without nasal polyps. The Exhalation Delivery System with Fluticasone (EDS-FLU) is an intranasal steroid in a device that delivers drug to regions above the inferior turbinate and behind the nasal valve. Method(s): In this phase 3, 24-week, randomized, controlled trial evaluating EDS-FLU versus EDS-placebo twice daily in chronic sinusitis without polyps, co-primary endpoints were combined symptom score (CSS;week 4) and average of percentages of CT-opacified volume across ethmoid/maxillary sinuses (APOV;week 24). Other outcomes included Quality-of-Life (SNOT-22, SF-36), Sleep (PSQI), and Patient-reported Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Result(s): Baseline scores suggest moderate-severe disease: mean CSS=6.0;APOV=62.0%. Both EDS-FLU doses [186microg (n=74) and 372microg (n=74)] significantly reduced both symptoms and sinus opacification versus EDS-placebo (n=75): CSS least-square (LS) mean change, EDS-placebo, -0.81;EDS-FLU 186microg, -1.54 (p<.05);EDS-FLU 372microg, -1.74, (p<.001);APOV LS mean change +1.19, -7.00 (p<.001), -5.14 (p<.01), respectively. EDS-FLU (n=145) vs EDS-placebo (n=75) also significantly improved secondary measures at Week 24 including SNOT-22 (LS mean -17.5 vs -8.7, p=.001);SF-36v2 (LS Mean PCS 4.9 vs 1.8, p=.002);PSQI Global score (LS mean -1.54 vs -.33;p<.001);and PGIC (60% vs 25% much/very much improved;p<.001). Adverse events (>=3% of patients and >EDS-placebo) were COVID-19, epistaxis, headache, and depression. Conclusion(s): EDS-FLU is the first and only drug to show improvement in a phase 3 trial in both symptoms and sinus opacification in chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps. Copyright © 2022

Role of Computed Tomography in Paranasal Sinuses - A Review Article

Computed tomography is one of the medical imaging tests in diagnosis. Multiple images of the inside of the body get captured in CT, like in traditional x-ray, but in various planes, can reformat the generated images. In CT, more excellent images are captured than in x-rays, especially for soft tissue and blood vessels. Four pairs of sinuses are there in the body, and small openings connect each to the nasal cavity. Out of the four sinuses, the paranasal sinus, a hollow and air-filled space, is located within the bones of the face. A vital role is played by Computed Tomography (CT) in the study of Paranasal Sinuses to diagnose and determine the various diseases related to paranasal sinuses. For example, multiple conditions like inflammatory, malignant neoplastic, and benign affect the paranasal sinus;all these conditions are diagnosed by CT Scans which directly help reduce the mortality and morbidity in patients suffering from diseases that affect the paranasal sinus. Besides this, CT Scans of paranasal sinus before functional endoscopic sinus surgery also help evaluate paranasal sinus disease and many more. The article aims to study the pathologies for which paranasal sinuses are affected and CT features of paranasal sinus diseases. Paranasal sinus computed tomography scans are performed for the measurements of - the volume of the nasal cavity. CT scan is also essential in evaluating anatomical variations to prove the correlation between the extent of disease and disease process in Sinonasal polyposis patients. Also, because of CT, paranasal sinus anatomy is delineated. This is the overview of the role of CT in paranasal sinus study (diagnostic, anatomical). Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.

Exhalation Delivery System with Fluticasone (EDS-FLU) Significantly Reduces Acute Exacerbations and Associated Antibiotic Use in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Background. Data suggest chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) may be the top reason for adult outpatient antibiotic use;of =10 million office visits per year for CRS, =70% result in antibiotic use. Acute exacerbations of CRS (AECRS) are common, possibly due to persistently impaired mucociliary clearance, and drive use of antibiotics. No drugs have been shown effective for reducing AECRS. ReOpen1 and 2 are randomized controlled trials that evaluated prevention of AECRS with the exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS-FLU;XHANCE), a novel device delivering topical steroid into chronically inflamed sinonasal regions not typically accessible with standard nasal sprays (eg, past the nasal valve and above the inferior turbinate). Methods. CRS patients were randomized to EDS-FLU one or two sprays per nostril or placebo twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks. Frequency of AECRS, defined as worsening of at least 1 cardinal symptom of CRS (nasal congestion/obstruction, rhinorrhea, facial pain/pressure, hyposmia/anosmia) for >= 3 days requiring escalation of medical care (eg, doctor visit, antibiotic or steroid prescription), was analyzed using pooled data from both trials. Results. Among 555 patients enrolled, 39.4% were using standard nasal steroids at study entry and 38.8% reported prior sinus surgery. There were 76 AECRS over 24 weeks, almost all (71) resulting in antibiotic use. Patients receiving EDS-FLU had a large reduction in AECRS versus placebo (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=0.39, P=0.001, vs placebo). Reduction was greater at the higher dose (2 sprays/nostril BID) than the lower dose (1 spray/nostril BID): IRR=0.34, P=0.002;IRR=0.44, P=0.012, respectively. 9.9% of low-dose patients and 7.8% of high-dose patients had >= 1 AECRS (20 and 15 events, respectively) vs 15.7% receiving placebo (41 events;P=0.012 and P=0.002 vs placebo, respectively). Treatment was well tolerated: adverse events in >= 3% of patients and more common in one active group than placebo were epistaxis, COVID-19, headache, and nasopharyngitis. Conclusion. EDS-FLU is the first and only medication shown in randomized controlled trials to significantly reduce acute exacerbations of CRS, offering potential to improve antibiotic stewardship by substantially reducing one of the most common drivers of outpatient antibiotic use. (Figure Presented).

Loss of smell in patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease impacts mental health and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: The impact of anosmia on quality-of-life (QoL) for patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is poorly understood. We aimed to investigate how the severity of smell loss and olfactory dysfunction (OD) in patients with AERD affects their QoL, mental health and physical well-being. METHODS: Five validated QoL questionnaires (Sinonasal Outcome Test-22, Asthma Control Test, Healthy Days Core Module-4, Short Form-36 and Patient Health Questionnaire-4) and two newly developed questionnaires assessing severity and consequences of OD were electronically sent to all 2913 patients in the Brigham and Women's Hospital AERD registry. Responses were received from 853 participants for analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 85% of participants reported a present diminished sense of smell and/or taste, and 30% categorized their OD severity was, "as bad as it can be." There were significant relationships between the severity of self-reported OD and both psychological distress and general health scores, even after adjusting for asthma control. Additionally, incidence rates for physically and mentally unhealthy days in the prior month were higher for patients with moderate or severe OD than for normosmic patients. Patients with diminished smell responded that they could not identify spoiled food (86%), did not enjoy food (71%), felt unsafe (63%) and had encountered dangerous situations (51%) as consequences of their OD. CONCLUSIONS: Anosmia and hyposmia severely impact the physical, emotional and mental health of AERD patients, and lead to safety concerns in their daily lives. The importance of olfaction and the relevance of OD to patients' QoL should be acknowledged and evaluated by clinicians caring for these patients.

Comparing the severity of chronic rhinosinusitis symptoms before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: COVID-19 measures such as masking, social distancing, and staying indoors may mitigate chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) symptoms. We evaluate whether these measures correlated with improved symptoms in patients with CRS. Methods: This retrospective study compared SNOT-22 survey data from the Northwestern CRS Registry at the time of enrollment and at years 1-5 of follow-up. The final sample consisted of 1826 SNOT-22 surveys for 598 patients. April 10, 2020 to December 31, 2021 was considered "during the pandemic" and prior to March 11, 2020 was considered "pre-pandemic." Wilcoxon test was used to compare SNOT22 at enrollment pre-pandemic versus during pandemic. Separate linear mixed models were performed to estimate SNOT22 at 1 to 5 years after enrollment pre-pandemic versus during pandemic. Results: Subjects enrolled during the pandemic had worse SNOT22 scores than those enrolled pre-pandemic (53 vs. 42, p = .0024). Total SNOT-22 scores were improved during the pandemic than before the pandemic at 1 year follow-up (18.17 vs. 12.22, p = .001). This effect persists when evaluating the nasal (7.33 vs. 5.13, p = .003), sleep (2.63 vs. 1.39, p = .008), function (1.40 vs. 0.72, p = .015), and emotion (0.77 vs. 0.17, p < .001) domains individually. There was no statistically significant difference in total SNOT-22 score at Years 2-5 of follow-up. Conclusions: Patients with CRS experience a greater reduction in symptom severity in their first year of treatment during the pandemic than before the pandemic, plausibly from measures such as masking and staying indoors. Level of Evidence: 4.

Cross-Cultural Validation of the Short Version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements into Italian: Towards Personalized Patient Care.

Given the high burden of olfactory dysfunction worldwide, recently increased due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is mandatory to adopt a specific questionnaire to assess the impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life, to be used in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to adapt and validate the short version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements (svQOD-NS) for Italian. In the pilot phase, the Italian version of the questionnaire (ITA-svQOD-NS) was produced following recommended guidelines. It was then given to 50 healthy subjects and 50 patients (affected by either nasal polyposis or septal deviation), and results were compared to those of other widely used questionnaires. Test-retest reliability was assessed on a sample of 25 patients. All 50 patients repeated the questionnaires at one and nine months after surgery. The internal consistency of ITA-svQOD-NS measured with Cronbach α was excellent (α = 0.92). The intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was also optimal (0.93; 95%CI: 0.90-0.96). Concurrent validity tested with the Pearson coefficient was significant with all other tests administered; also, concerning responsiveness, statistically significant differences were obtained between pre- and post-operative conditions. ITA-svQOD-NS showed high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and significant correlation with all most-used clinical questionnaires; thus, it can be efficiently applied to assess olfaction-related QoL in the Italian population.

The role of viruses in the inception of sinusitis.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a complex inflammatory disorder that affects between 2 and 16% of adults in the United States with estimated healthcare costs between 4 to 12 million USD. Viruses are a frequent cause of upper respiratory infections and a trigger for CRS exacerbations. There are several cross-sectional studies that have identified types of viruses associated with CRS. Rhinovirus, parainfluenza virus, influenza virus, and respiratory syncytial virus were the main associated viruses found in nasal lavage samples of patients with CRS. Other viruses such as adenovirus or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have weak associations with CRS and were excluded from the review. Rhinovirus and its subtypes utilize glycoproteins like intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) family members, and cadherin-related family member 3 (CDHR3) to invade host cells. Influenza and parainfluenza virus invade through the binding of hemagglutinin (HA) to sialic acid-containing molecules while respiratory syncytial virus has a RSV specific glycoprotein that binds to the cellular receptor human nucleolin (NCL). Viral infection that causes CRS is frequently associated with type 1 and type 2 immune responses. Dysregulated immune response to viral infections can result in the activation of airway remodeling, epithelial-mesenchymal transitions, and epithelial barrier breakdown that are central to the pathogenesis of CRS. Risk factors for viral infections in CRS. Dysfunctional epithelial barrier function and age are strong risk factors for CRS infections. Comorbid respiratory diseases like asthma or allergic rhinitis are highly associated with CRS risk and CRS exacerbations. Children are also more likely to have upper respiratory tract infections than adults and viruses associated with CRS are more prevalent in infants and children. Studying and understanding the role of viruses in CRS is an important step in identifying disease pathogenesis and targeting these pathways early to slow disease progression.

Pharmacokinetic Evidence of Steady and Sustained Drug Release from Long-Acting Implantable Corticosteroid Matrices for Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of topical corticosteroids is limited in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) due to rapid clearance from the nasal cavity and insufficient drug delivery to inflamed sinonasal passages. LYR-210 is an implantable corticosteroid matrix designed to provide up to 24 weeks of treatment to patients with CRS by locally delivering mometasone furoate (MF) to the sinonasal mucosa. In a randomized, controlled, dose-ranging LANTERN study, LYR-210 (7500 µg) achieved clinically relevant improvement in CRS cardinal symptom composite scores, the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), ethmoid opacification, and the need for rescue treatment at 24 weeks. OBJECTIVE: As the plasma MF concentrations of LYR-210 (2500 µg) and LYR-210 (7500 µg) were evaluated at weeks 4, 12, and 24 in the LANTERN study (data on file at Lyra Therapeutics, Inc.), this study aims to characterize the pharmacokinetic profiles of both doses of LYR-210 at earlier timepoints post-placement in patients with CRS. METHODS: Twenty-four surgically naïve adult patients with CRS were enrolled in an open-label, multicenter study and underwent in-office bilateral administration of LYR-210 (2500 µg) (n = 12 patients) or LYR-210 (7500 µg) (n = 12 patients) into the middle meatus. Plasma MF concentrations were determined pre-placement and 1-h post-placement (day 1), and on days 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, and 56 by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Both LYR-210 doses were well-tolerated with no serious adverse events. Systemic MF levels were dose-dependent and lower than reported values of other respiratory MF products. Plasma MF concentrations showed steady drug release from LYR-210 (2500 µg) and LYR-210 (7500 µg) that persisted through day 56. CONCLUSION: LYR-210 achieved dose-dependent, continuous local MF delivery at a steady rate with low systemic exposure for months.

Impact of COVID-19 versus chronic rhinosinusitis/rhinitis associated olfactory dysfunction on health utility and quality of life.

Background: Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is associated with both post-viral and inflammatory etiologies such as COVID-19 and chronic rhinosinusitis/rhinitis (CRS/R) respectively, to result in reduced quality of life (QoL). However, the former typically induces a sudden-onset OD while the latter has a gradual presentation. This study aims to establish and compare health utility values (HUVs) and olfactory-specific QoL measurements between patients with COVID-19 and CRS/R related OD. Methods: This prospective study surveyed COVID-19 and CRS/R patients with self-reported OD using HUV assessments (EuroQol-visual analog scale [EQ-VAS], EuroQol-5 dimension [EQ-5D], time trade-off [TTO]) and olfactory and sinonasal QoL measures (questionnaire of olfactory disorders -negative and positive statements [QOD-NS + PS] and sino-nasal outcome test [SNOT-22]). A subgroup of subjects completed objective olfactory testing. Intergroup mean scores were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: One hundred eleven subjects were enrolled: mean age ± SD (43.0 ± 15.4 years), 55.9% female. CRS/R was associated with lower HUVs as measured by EQ-VAS (CRS/R: 0.67 ± 0.18 vs. COVID-19: 0.74 ± 0.19, p = .03) and worse SNOT-22 scores in both overall (CRS/R: 49.03 ± 21.04 vs. COVID-19: 27.58 ± 18.45, p < .001) and subgroup analysis of objectively confirmed OD subjects (CRS/R: 52.40 ± 22.78 vs. COVID-19: 29.84 ± 21.10, p = .01). On the other hand, COVID-19 has greater burden on olfactory-specific QoL (QOD-NS + PS, COVID-19: 23.19 ± 13.73 vs. CRS/R: 17.25 ± 11.38, p = .04). Both groups demonstrated a similar decrease in health using the EQ-5D assessment. Conclusion: CRS/R associated OD has a more severe impact on general health and sinonasal specific QoL outcomes, while COVID-19 associated OD has a greater burden on olfactory-specific QoL. Level of evidence: Level 2c.

SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19) and Rhinologic Manifestation: Narrative Review.

Patients with severe pneumonia of unknown etiology presented in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. A novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), was isolated from the respiratory tracts of these patients. The World Health Organization (WHO) defined respiratory diseases due to SARS-CoV-2 infection as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Many researchers have reported that the nasal cavity is an important initial route for SARS-CoV-2 infection and that the spike protein of this virus binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) on epithelial cell surfaces. Therefore, COVID-19 is thought to significantly affect nasal symptoms and various rhinological diseases. In this review, we summarize the association between COVID-19 and various rhinological diseases, such as olfactory dysfunction, rhinosinusitis, and allergic rhinitis.

Digital tools in allergy and respiratory care.

Patient care in the allergy and respiratory fields is advancing rapidly, offering the possibility of the inclusion of a variety of digital tools that aim to improve outcomes of care. Impaired access to several health care facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic has considerably increased the appetite and need for the inclusion of e-health tools amongst end-users. Consequently, a multitude of different e-health tools have been launched worldwide with various registration and access options, and with a wide range of offered benefits. From the perspective of both patients and healthcare providers (HCPs), as well as from a legal and device-related perspective, several features are important for the acceptance, effectiveness,and long-term use of e-health tools. Patients and physicians have different needs and expectations of how digital tools might be of help in the care pathway. There is a need for standardization by defining quality assurance criteria. Therefore, the Upper Airway Diseases Committee of the World Allergy Organization (WAO) has taken the initiative to define and propose criteria for quality, appeal, and applicability of e-health tools in the allergy and respiratory care fields from a patient, clinician, and academic perspective with the ultimate aim to improve patient health and outcomes of care.

SWOT Analysis of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Care Anno 2022.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a prevalent chronic condition with dynamic developments in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches given the recent updated guidelines and novel therapeutic approaches. A critical reflection on clinical practice of CRS care in 2022 is needed, hence providing hints for better care. This review provides an overall evaluation of the current approach of CRS care, including strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threat related to the current care pathways in most regions worldwide. Strengths of current CRS care are mainly related to effective treatment options allowing personalized care, with preventive and curative goals included in the current guidelines. However, a large portion of patients with CRS remain uncontrolled given the multiple weaknesses in CRS care, related to several factors such as underdiagnosis, undertreatment, and suboptimal coordination of care among health care providers. The opportunities for better care are ample given the possibility of implementing optimal care following guidelines, including preventive interdisciplinary strategies and patient-oriented treatment plans. In 2022, CRS represents a chronic condition that is subject to a (r)evolution of care with good opportunities for better outcomes and health economic savings.